| |
Homeopathic Essentials
by Jane Lane
February 1, 2000
The principles of homeopathy are
elegantly basic and, to some, maddeningly elusive. This
system of medical treatment employs The Law of Similars or
"like cures like," and calls on natural plant, animal and
mineral substances that induce the body to heal itself.
That homeopathy works is virtually incontrovertible. With
its ancient roots and European practice spanning hundreds of
years, homeopathy employs minute doses of diluted extracts
to replicate symptoms of a malady, which then vanishes. But
the very fact that it works puzzles many experts who have
researched the phenomenon.
Understanding The Tradition
Homeopathy evolved from its earliest practice recorded by
10th-century BC Hindu sages to its codification by
Hippocrates in 400 BC. " Through the like, disease is
produced and through the application of the like, it is
cured," he wrote, expressing the fundamental principle of
homeopathy, according to Homeopathic Medicine at Home (Tarcher
Perigee) by Maesimund B. Panos, MD, and Jane Heimlich.
Samuel Christian Friedrich Hahnemann, the erudite and
intellectually audacious German physician and chemist,
seized upon the essentials of homeopathy in the early 1800s.
Through Hahnemann's work, homeopathy developed into an
intricately systematized science, veering into the arcane
for the contemporary individual seeking relief for everyday
ailments.
Modern practitioners and manufacturers of homeopathic
remedies benefit from Hahnemann's daring research (which
included potentially lethal experiments on himself) and
complex doctrines.
They've streamlined and modernized Hahnemann's concepts to
provide more relevance to modern ills and sensibilities.
The Bold Experiments
Hahnemann denounced the medical practices of the 18th
century, which involved cauterizing, bleeding, blistering
and purging patients to expel the pernicious fluids or
humors believed to cause disease.
He also reviled the kind of omnibus prescription drugs of
the day, which loaded many substances into one compound.
In 1790, Hahnemann conducted his groundbreaking experiment
establishing the basis of homeopathy.
The customary treatment for malaria at the time was Cinchona
officinalis or Peruvian bark-quinine. Medical wisdom
attributed its efficacy to its bitterness and astringency.
Hahnemann rejected this explanation, noting that other
botanicals are far more bitter and astringent, yet are
powerless against malaria.
To prove his theory, Hahnemann took some cinchona compound
and promptly developed the symptoms of malaria. His
deduction: Like cures like, or The Law of Similars. A
substance that, in minute doses, induces certain symptoms in
a healthy person cures a sick one.
The Set of Laws
A set of fairly complex laws developed from Hahnemann's
initial Law of Similars.
The Law of Proving refers to the process of ascertaining the
effectiveness of a homeopathic therapy by administering a
substance to a healthy person to record in minute detail its
effects. Practitioners also use the standard double-blind
method using a placebo or unmedicated tablet against a
homeopathic compound.
The first proving was performed in 1790 and the procedure
endures today, using only humans, not laboratory animals,
for greater accuracy. As homeopathic preparations are not
toxic, proving has never produced lasting adverse reactions.
Descriptions of provings are compiled into books called
materia medicas, including Boericke's Materia Medica and
Repertory and The Lectures of Homeopathic Materia by James
Tyler Kent, used regularly in contemporary practice.
The books are highly indexed collections of symptoms and the
remedies that cure them called repertories. The most
extensively used repertory is Kent's Repertory of the
Homeopathic Materia Medica.
In 1800, the third Law of Potentization was devised,
regulating the processing of homeopathic remedies through
successive dilutions and shaking.
This law represents perhaps the profoundest mystery of
homeopathy and demands the boldest leap of faith: The higher
the dilution, the more intense the potency of the medicine.
Substances that are inert in their natural state act as
medicine. And as they are so dilute, homeopathic remedies do
not act directly on the tissues, accounting for their
non-toxicity.
Adding to the inherent safety of homeopathic therapies is
the discipline's adherence to the single remedy. Centuries
ago, homeopaths seemed to have been prescient about current
drug interaction troubles.
(Historical information courtesy of Homeopathic Medicine at
Home by Panos and Heimlich.)
How It Works: The Vital Force
Homeopathy embraces a philosophy centered on the concept of
"vital force," an intelligent, dynamic life force within
each individual responsible for maintaining one's life and
balance on all levels. The vital force creates a defense
mechanism similar to the immune system, but incorporates
protection against imbalances on the emotional and mental
planes as well.
Homeopathy equates disease with imbalance. As the defense
mechanism attempts to restore balance, symptoms appear:
pain, swelling, rashes and fevers on the physical side;
grief, jealousy, anxiety, anger, confusion and loss of
memory on the emotional and mental end.
Homeopaths regards these symptoms as evidence of the vital
force's curative exertions, not merely annoyances to be
eliminated. Symptoms guide the homeopath in his or her
attempts to harmoniously augment the efforts of the vital
force.
Homeopathy Today
Homeopathic remedies are prepared according to the standards
of the United States Homeopathic Pharmacopoeia and are
recognized by the US Food and Drug Administration. "
Homeopathy respects the complexity and uniqueness of each
individual," observes pharmacist and naturopathic doctor
James LaValle (and his co-authors) in Smart Medicine for
Healthier Living. "To identify the correct homeopathic
remedy, you must carefully observe your unique-even
quirky-behaviors and responses."
Indeed the emphasis on the "unique, even quirky" may lead to
the perception of homeopathy as a sketchy pseudo-science.
Homeopathy simply does not fit the drug model of allopathic
medicine.
Its ability to help people, however, has been repeatedly
evaluated through rigorous scientific research. A
comprehensive review in the British Medical Journal (302,
1991: 316-323) of more than 100 clinical studies of
homeopathy published during the last 30 years revealed that
77% of those studies produced positive results for the
people involved.
A host of additional studies provides clinical evidence:
• A fixed combination of three plant substances (Phytolacca
americana, Guajacum officinale and Capsicum annuum)
significantly decreased the symptoms of acute tonsillitis in
107 sufferers, who took no antibiotics. The
anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory and analgesic properties
produced no side effects (Adv Ther 15, 1998: 362-71).
• An article in the Journal of Nurse Midwifery (44, 1999:
280-90) explains the use of 19 homeopathic remedies that aid
breastfeeding.
• "The practice of (homeopathic) preventive antepartum care
of pregnant women, adopted at the beginning of this century,
has reduced perinatal mortality and the rates of low birth
weights and preterm weights. . .Studies on homeopathic
interventions in obstetrics report positive influence of
homeopathic remedies on uterine contractility and the
evolution of childbirth. The only study comparing
homeopathic and conventional therapy in women with increased
risk for contraction abnormalities found few differences
between the treatments, except fewer hemorrhages and
decreased abnormal contractions in patients treated with
homeopathic remedies (Schweiz Med Wochenschr Suppl 62, 1994:
28-35).
• A homeopathic remedy proved as effective as prescription
betahistine hydrochloride in treating folks with vertigo
(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 124, 1998: 879-85).
n Single, individualized homeopathic remedies demonstrated
potential efficacy in HIV infection during its symptomatic
period (Br Homeopath J 88, 1999: 49-57). The remedies
produced a "statistically significant" elevation in base
line immune status.
• And, finally, a study in the prestigious international
medical journal The Lancet (September 20, 1997) claimed that
researchers' findings and conclusions "are not compatible
with the hypothesis that the clinical effects of homeopathy
are completely due to placebo" but called for more
"rigorous. . .systematic" research on homeopathy.
|